<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does wealth mean to you?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dividendmoney.com/what-does-wealth-mean-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dividendmoney.com/what-does-wealth-mean-to-you/</link>
	<description>Personal Finance With A Cash Flow Focus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 02:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://dividendmoney.com/what-does-wealth-mean-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendmoney.com/archives/what-does-wealth-mean-to-you/#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Cash,
You are fundamentally correct.  In relative terms everyone would rather make more than their peers and have more buying power.  However, I was thinking in terms of everything else being constant (buying power, inflation etc.) that people would rather make more than others than simply make more total money.
From this point of view, I think that it is sad.  From your point of view, you are correct, it is an obvious choice.  
Thank you for the feedback, you point is valid and well taken.
Have a great day,
Tyler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cash,<br />
You are fundamentally correct.  In relative terms everyone would rather make more than their peers and have more buying power.  However, I was thinking in terms of everything else being constant (buying power, inflation etc.) that people would rather make more than others than simply make more total money.<br />
From this point of view, I think that it is sad.  From your point of view, you are correct, it is an obvious choice.<br />
Thank you for the feedback, you point is valid and well taken.<br />
Have a great day,<br />
Tyler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cash</title>
		<link>http://dividendmoney.com/what-does-wealth-mean-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Cash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividendmoney.com/archives/what-does-wealth-mean-to-you/#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Whats so sad about this survey?  The results are pretty obvious, if everyone is earning 200k and you are making 110k, that just means inflation caught up to everyone else except you.

I am pretty sure your buying power would be much less with the 110k scenario vs. the 100k scenario.  Based on that yes I&#039;d definitely go for the 100k while everyone else makes 85.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats so sad about this survey?  The results are pretty obvious, if everyone is earning 200k and you are making 110k, that just means inflation caught up to everyone else except you.</p>
<p>I am pretty sure your buying power would be much less with the 110k scenario vs. the 100k scenario.  Based on that yes I&#8217;d definitely go for the 100k while everyone else makes 85.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

